Crosstown Station Naming

Metrolinx have proposed some changes to station names on the Crosstown LRT and want public feedback. Go to their site to participate.

I get on a Bathurst car and go along Bathurst until I come to Bathurst Station. Then I get on a bus and go along Bathurst to another Bathurst Station. Confusing? Yes indeed, but imagine how visitors find their way around.

A station is a place, not a route ten miles long. Bathurst is a route ten miles long, not a place. Lets un-fuddle our thinking and separate route names from place names. Or use both streets eg Bloor/Bathurst just like the brash Americans. Or follow our own example, University Avenue stations, which have the cross street as a sub heading and in parentheses, as in ‘OSGOODE (Queen)’. This appears to work well, and no one in fact refers to Queen.

Method Example Preferrence
Neighborhood naming Aga Khan Yes
American style naming Bloor/Bathurst No
University Avenue naming OSGOODE (Queen) Yes

Most of the changes proposed by Metrolinx move away from using cross street names, which is good, to neighborhood names, which is as it should be, and which has the potential to boost neighborhood identities, while at the same time avoiding obvious confusion. I suggest all Crosstown cross street station names be changed, and new names chosen by local consultation.

Station naming should be a fundamental planning step to engage the local communities all along the long line. Organize community groups, at least one per station locale, to explore local history, get schools involved, seniors, conduct ballots, and come up with home grown meaningful names. Given the huge dollars to build these things, the naming (process) is well worth a few more. Kids for a generation will remember the process, ‘I live in ‘Belgravia’, the name, lets say, the community chose for the station at Oakwood Ave.

Completion of Crosstown is still years away, an abundance of time for such a process. And when names are chosen, erect large temporary attractive signage, ‘Site of Crosstown Belgravia Station’.

Of the seven stations that Metrolinx wants to change, their proposals seem fine except for three. Aga Khan is excellent, anticipating a future landmark if it is not one now, but the tag Eglinton is ridiculous, unless ‘Eglinton’ is in brackets a la University Line names. Leaside is a historical name with a CP train station there years ago, but watch out since it may better apply to Laird and not Bayview – ask the locals. And Oriole obviously confuses with Oriole GO, miles away, so don’t go there!

This entry was posted in Traffic. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Crosstown Station Naming

  1. I completely agree. In the past, I’ve actually gone to the wrong station because of this problem. A friend said: meet me at the Eglinton subway station main doors. So I went to the Eglinton station at Yonge. However, they should have said the Eglinton WEST subway station (near the Allen), which is where they were waiting. As Toronto builds more rapid transit lines, streets may have multiple stations at various intersection points. It’s small town thinking to name them all after the same street.


  2. Mary West says:

    To avoid confusion, combined subway Crosstown station could be called Uptown


  3. Mary says:

    Perhaps the combined Yonge/Eglinton station should be renamed Uptown.


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s